On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 21/06/09 13:28, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> That page does indeed reflect the current state of play - there is
> >> *no* centos approved or recommended commercial support entity - but
> >> it *is* something that is being worked on.
> >
> > i realize that page is *technically* correct, but its wording is
> > quite discouraging:
>
> If you want to propose a blob of text that might replace whats on
> the page right now, I am sure we can plumb that in.
i'm not the right person for that as i am utterly clueless about
what possibilities you're exploring at the moment. that has to be
done by someone at centos who's involved in it.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================