Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > >> On 21/06/09 13:28, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> >>>> That page does indeed reflect the current state of play - there is >>>> *no* centos approved or recommended commercial support entity - but >>>> it *is* something that is being worked on. >>>> >>> i realize that page is *technically* correct, but its wording is >>> quite discouraging: >>> >> If you want to propose a blob of text that might replace whats on >> the page right now, I am sure we can plumb that in. >> > > i'm not the right person for that as i am utterly clueless about > what possibilities you're exploring at the moment. that has to be > done by someone at centos who's involved in it. > > rday > -- > > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA > > Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry. > > Web page: http://crashcourse.ca > Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday > Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday > ======================================================================== > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > if you are going to be the consultant and you are recommending Centos then you are definitely a good person to make a suggestion as to what should go in there. Take a whack at it.