> Where did you see the QA requirements for the packages
> in c.k.o ?
I didn't. But since you say that there is a reason for
them to be in "testing", I then assumed the reason was
"testing". But then, the activity usually called "testing"
is part of a process usually called Quality Assurance.
But hey, maybe I am way to stupid to match your geniality!
> Also, why are you ignoring what has already
> been said to you about the repo and the target
> audience its aimed at ?
*What* exactly has been said and by whom?
I only saw you inferring what it's *not* aimed at:
people who don't like things in "testing".
As I said, and as everyone on this list knows:
KB is not a person to talk with. Usually, KB would
throw offensive assertion to people. No matter
what KB would say, and no matter how important is
KB to the CentOS project, a quick search through
the centos ML archives would show that KB is not
someone easy to deal with.
Probably I should stop posting to this list. I only
mentioned KB's repo in the context of packages
staying in "testing" for years.
R-C
__________________________________________________________________
Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8. Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/