[CentOS] 5.3 and ext4
Peter Kjellstrom
cap at nsc.liu.seThu Mar 19 12:22:54 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] 5.3 and ext4
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux - different context on subdirectories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Jerry Geis wrote: > Is 5.3 and ext4 going to be safe? > I have seen a couple reports of data loss using ext4? > Has this already been fixed? Like Jim said, not ext4's fault. > What does the list recommend? ext3/ ext4? Ext4 (actually ext4dev) in 5.3 will be a preview and not meant for general use. So most people should probably stay with ext3. /Peter > Thought maybe today we would start seeing 5.3 showing up... Looking > forward to it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090319/26f71e2f/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] 5.3 and ext4
- Next message: [CentOS] SELinux - different context on subdirectories
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list