Lanny Marcus schrieb: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus <lmmailinglists at gmail.com> wrote: > >> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the >> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the >> webmaster should happen to read this... >> > > As I posted late yesterday afternoon, the problem went away a few days > ago, but then began again, yesterday. I can ping the server and > traceroute to it, but no http for me from centos.org again. Tru, if > you read this, I hope you will reopen the Trouble Ticket at Layered > Tech, again. If they believe the problem is not theirs, hopefully they > will open a Trouble Ticket with Level3. Traceroute I just made is > below. Thank you! Lanny > > [lanny at dell2400 ~]$ traceroute centos.org > traceroute to centos.org (72.232.194.162), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets > 1 ipcop233 (192.168.10.1) 0.525 ms 0.518 ms 0.530 ms > 2 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 2.100 ms 2.958 ms 2.927 ms > 3 dsl-emcali-190.1.240.1.emcali.net.co (190.1.240.1) 23.220 ms > 25.265 ms 27.106 ms > 4 172.16.1.3 (172.16.1.3) 29.382 ms 31.392 ms 33.774 ms > 5 190.90.2.25 (190.90.2.25) 68.564 ms 68.975 ms 69.220 ms > 6 so-4-2-3-nmi-core01.nwnnetwork.net (63.245.40.157) 105.957 ms * * > 7 * ge-1-1-0-nmi-core02.columbus-networks.com (63.245.5.0) 78.319 > ms 76.043 ms > 8 xe-8-0-0.edge2.Miami1.Level3.net (4.59.84.5) 89.541 ms 92.189 ms > 94.493 ms > 9 ae-31-51.ebr1.Miami1.Level3.net (4.69.138.94) 99.756 ms 100.047 > ms 101.620 ms > 10 ae-2.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.140.133) 144.085 ms 144.384 > ms 144.732 ms > 11 ae-71-71.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.126) 147.074 ms * * > 12 * * ae-42-99.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.196) 137.429 ms > 13 DATABANK-HO.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.2) 140.261 ms > 114.191 ms 118.113 ms > 14 ae_cw_10g.databank.com (63.164.96.62) 120.519 ms 124.321 ms > aw_cw_10g.databank.com (63.164.96.54) 128.517 ms > 15 pod22e_aw.layeredtech.com (63.164.96.178) 128.776 ms 130.954 ms > pod22h_ae.layeredtech.com (63.164.96.162) 132.805 ms > 16 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) > 114.030 ms !X 116.744 ms !X 116.070 ms !X > [lanny at dell2400 ~]$ > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > FYI: this is what I get from my colo'ed box in Germany: srv3# traceroute centos.org traceroute to centos.org (72.232.194.162), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 gw.rtr2.colo1.NBG1.content-colo.net (80.190.225.9) 0.376 ms 0.380 ms 0.369 ms 2 p10-91.cr1.NBG1.content-core.net (212.123.123.225) 0.355 ms p10-92.cr2.NBG1.content-core.net (212.123.123.241) 0.375 ms p10-91.cr1.NBG1.content-core.net (212.123.123.225) 0.368 ms 3 te-7-2.edge3.frf1.Level3.net (212.162.19.33) 8.328 ms Tenge1-1-40.cr2.NBG1.content-core.net (212.123.123.122) 0.382 ms te-7-2.edge3.frf1.Level3.net (212.162.19.33) 8.177 ms 4 vlan79.csw2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.68.23.126) 15.194 ms te-7-2.edge3.frf1.Level3.net (212.162.19.33) 8.328 ms vlan79.csw2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.68.23.126) 8.488 ms 5 vlan79.csw2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.68.23.126) 15.031 ms ae-82-82.ebr2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.69.140.25) 8.641 ms vlan79.csw2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.68.23.126) 8.490 ms 6 ae-41-41.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.137.50) 98.025 ms ae-82-82.ebr2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.69.140.25) 8.644 ms ae-72-72.ebr2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net (4.69.140.21) 8.486 ms 7 ae-92-92.csw4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.158) 99.121 ms ae-43-43.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.137.58) 98.032 ms ae-62-62.csw1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.146) 105.569 ms 8 ae-82-82.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.154) 104.113 ms * ae-72-72.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.150) 99.957 ms 9 * * ae-71-71.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.133) 111.362 ms 10 * * ae-7.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.134.21) 138.031 ms 11 ae-7.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.134.21) 133.965 ms ae-93-93.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.166) 135.473 ms * 12 ae-93-93.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.166) 134.879 ms ae-12-69.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.4) 132.669 ms ae-63-63.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.154) 141.555 ms 13 DATABANK-HO.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.2) 132.499 ms ae-12-69.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.4) 132.503 ms DATABANK-HO.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.2) 133.758 ms 14 DATABANK-HO.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.2) 133.432 ms 63.164.96.62 (63.164.96.62) 132.821 ms 63.164.96.54 (63.164.96.54) 133.286 ms 15 63.164.96.54 (63.164.96.54) 133.754 ms 63.164.96.242 (63.164.96.242) 132.972 ms 63.164.96.54 (63.164.96.54) 136.101 ms 16 * 63.164.96.242 (63.164.96.242) 133.342 ms * 17 * * 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 133.028 ms !Z 18 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 133.135 ms !Z 132.824 ms !Z 134.067 ms !Z This got me thinking and I ran mtr (with -c 10 -r): srv3# mtr -c 10 -r centos.org HOST: srv3.ultra-secure.de Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. gw.rtr2.colo1.NBG1.content-c 0.0% 10 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 2. p10-92.cr2.NBG1.content-core 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 3. te-7-2.edge3.frf1.Level3.net 0.0% 10 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 0.0 4. vlan99.csw4.Frankfurt1.Level 0.0% 10 8.6 12.6 8.4 20.6 5.0 5. ae-92-92.ebr2.Frankfurt1.Lev 0.0% 10 8.4 8.7 8.4 9.5 0.3 6. ae-42-42.ebr2.Washington1.Le 0.0% 10 96.8 96.8 96.7 97.0 0.1 7. ae-92-92.csw4.Washington1.Le 0.0% 10 98.6 102.3 97.0 110.3 5.0 8. ae-91-91.ebr1.Washington1.Le 50.0% 10 101.8 103.6 98.6 109.8 4.1 9. ae-2.ebr3.Atlanta2.Level3.ne 30.0% 10 115.2 118.9 114.1 124.7 4.4 10. ae-7.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net 20.0% 10 132.4 135.5 130.9 142.2 4.7 11. ae-73-73.csw2.Dallas1.Level3 0.0% 10 143.9 137.7 131.2 143.9 4.9 12. ae-22-79.car2.Dallas1.Level3 0.0% 10 131.0 196.7 131.0 318.9 77.2 13. DATABANK-HO.car2.Dallas1.Lev 0.0% 10 131.0 131.2 130.8 131.7 0.3 14. 63.164.96.62 0.0% 10 131.5 131.3 130.8 131.5 0.2 15. 63.164.96.162 10.0% 10 131.9 131.8 131.4 132.4 0.3 16. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17. 162.194.232.72.static.revers 10.0% 10 131.2 131.5 131.2 131.7 0.1 srv3# So, from this point of view, L3 seems to be losing some packets. Regards, Rainer