[CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server

Tue Mar 31 15:37:37 UTC 2009
Care India <care.india.support at gmail.com>

How to stop recieving mail from CentOS forum ?

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>wrote:

> Alessandro Ren wrote:
> >      Qmail is fantastic, have sued for years, but for workgroup,
> > calendaring feaures, Zimbra is the way.
> >
>
> I have decided to give SME a go. It provides Qmail on Centos 4.7, with
> Centos 5.2 in beta.
>
> I chose SME because I also have to replace an NT server here as well, so
> it makes a good fit.
>
> I have a test system working and building the mailserver replacement
> system now. Then I will build the NT server replacement.
>
> >         []s.
> >
> > On 3/17/2009 7:30 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> >
> >> Am 17.03.2009 um 21:19 schrieb Per Qvindesland:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> No as I said it does not have all the synchronizing stuff but rock
> >>> solid
> >>> email server, sadly Zimbra in my humble opinion not really free, but
> >>> of
> >>> course there is http://www.opengroupware.org/ http://www.citadel.org/
> >>> http://www.open-xchange.com/EN/developer/index.html and
> http://kolab.org
> >>>   to
> >>> mention a few all with their own pro's and con's
> >>>
> >>>
> >> All the "free" solutions depend on you spending an extra-ordinary
> >> amount of time configuring them.
> >>
> >> The amount of QA needed to pull something like Zimbra off is
> >> staggering (sometimes it's still not enough QA....)
> >>
> >> My own mail is qmail-only - I gave-up trying to get all the
> >> calendaring-packages running long ago.
> >> But at work, we have Zimbra and is is really cool IMO.
> >> It has a slick web-interface, it sync's with Outlook, Mac - and then
> >> there is this great/horrible fat client called Zimbra Desktop...
> >> ;-)
> >>
> >>
> >> I have to admit, though, that the list-price for a small amount of
> >> mailboxes looks not so cheap (esp. if you want Zimbra Mobile).
> >> (How many mailboxes does the original author want to replace, actually?)
> >>
> >> But still, I'm kind of fascinated by it - mostly, because it's very
> >> openly developed and by browsing through their bugzilla and P4
> >> repository-webinterface, you get a good idea of what current issues
> >> there are, what would get fixed by going to a newer version (and which
> >> new bugs to expect).
> >> I wish every vendor did that.
> >>
> >> We run it on CentOS, BTW (test/dev environment via Virtuozzo,
> >> production on physical hardware).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Rainer
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CentOS mailing list
> >> CentOS at centos.org
> >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090331/0a89312c/attachment-0005.html>