[CentOS] Missing Thunderbird Updates

nate centos at linuxpowered.net
Wed May 20 22:00:03 UTC 2009


Ned Slider wrote:

> I think the point is that there must be something very wrong/broken if
> a) security updates are missing for over a month, and b) people don't
> even like to ask for fear of offending someone, and c) no one really
> talks about it.
>
> One of the projects stated goals has always been to release updates
> within 72 hours, and often within 24 hours from upstream release. This
> isn't about missing that target by a day or two, but rather that
> security updates are completely missed altogether until someone notices
> and says something at which point they normally appear 24 hours later.
> It looks more like the process is broken to me, but as we have no idea
> what the process actually is it's impossible to tell.

Yes I agree, it seems that CentOS has been resource constrained for
some time now, I'm not certain what the constraint is but myself I
try not to complain since it is a volunteer effort. I've gotten the
impression that there seems to be only a few(perhaps 4 or less) people
working on the actual packaging stuff, and they probably don't get
paid to make it a full time job, I'm sure it's not easy work.

It'd be nice of some of the bigger companies that benefit from CentOS
would contribute more, as of a few years ago at least F5 Networks
used CentOS code on their load balancers[CentOS 3.x, very stripped
down](prices ranging from $15k-500k), I don't think they have switched
distributions since. The NAS cluster we have here comes from a company
called Exanet(list price over $100k), and it runs on CentOS 4.4. I'm
sure there are several others..

Hopefully they can get the support they need to beef up things
like security updates and stuff, it seems things have been going
downhill for a while now.

nate





More information about the CentOS mailing list