[CentOS] lacie drive and CentOS 5.3 question...

Ray Van Dolson rayvd at bludgeon.org
Mon May 25 19:53:55 UTC 2009


On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:24:03PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2009, Dag Wieers wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can anyone advise me on how I can tell my system the above device is a
> >>> mass storage device?  Do I need to write some udev rules?
> >>
> >> Sorry for replying to my own post, but upon further investigation, it
> >> appears that perhaps the usb-storage module doesn't have the correct
> >> matching pattern in place to detect this as a mass storage device:
> >>
> >> udevmonitor reports the device having a module alias of:
> >>
> >>  usb:v0451p6250d0300dcFFdsc00dp00icFFisc00ip00
> >>
> >> And modinfo usb-storage shows:
> >>
> >>  # modinfo usb-storage | grep v045
> >>  alias:          usb:v045Ap5210d0101dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*
> >>  alias:          usb:v0457p0151d0100dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*
> >>  alias:          usb:v0457p0150d0100dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*
> >>  alias:          usb:v0451p5416d0100dc*dsc*dp*ic*isc*ip*
> >>
> >> Which obviously won't match.  So the question is, how do I add a new
> >> alias to the module?  And will the module even support my device?
> >
> > Just a wild an crazy idea, how about adding it to /etc/modprobe.conf ?
> >
> > 	alias usb:v0451p6250d0300dcFFdsc00dp00icFFisc00ip00 usb-storage
> >
> > Not sure if it makes sense, but it's worth trying :)
> 
> After doing some research it seems that this is valid, if you perform:
> 
>  	modprobe -c
> 
> you get an identical list for all known devices. So adding yours should 
> definitely help.
> 
> PS What kind of LaCie disk is it ? I recently bought a 500GB LaCie Little 
> Disk and that one worked fine.

I actually did try adding the above alias line with no luck although
the following command:

  modprobe -v -n --first-time usb:v0451p6250d0300dcFFdsc00dp00icFFisc00ip00

Now shows a "match".  I'm beginning to think the kernel doesn't support
this device, or isn't properly exposing it to /sys as it should be.

I added a udev rule:

  BUS=="usb",ACTION=="add",SYSFS{idVendor}=="0451",SYSFS{idProduct}=="6250",RUN+="/sbin/modprobe usb-storage",NAME="walter"

And when I plug in my device, I get the following entry under /dev:

  crw------- 1 root root 189, 19 May 25 12:02 /dev/walter

Obviously this isn't major type 8 which I would expect to see for a
disk... also:

With udevmonitor on my Fedora machine, I see a device created with
major type 189, but then later, a SCSI device is detected and a device
of major type 8 is set up.  This doesn't happen on CentOS, only the 189
device is created.

Also, on my Fedora system the vendor id and Product ID's are different.

Fedora:

  059f:0527 LaCie, Ltd 

Cent:

  0451:6250 Texas Instruments, Inc.

So I'm beginning to think that the kernel is sending "incorrect" or
dated information into /sys and the event sent to udev is either
misleading or incomplete somehow.

It's a 500GB "Big Disk".

I'll keep poking around... thanks for the reponse. :)

Ray



More information about the CentOS mailing list