[CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem
Scott Silva
ssilva at sgvwater.comThu May 14 21:39:44 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem
- Next message: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
on 5-14-2009 2:21 PM Les Mikesell spake the following: > Scott Silva wrote: >> on 5-14-2009 1:24 PM Pasi � spake the following: >>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote: >>>> Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started >>>> typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button). >>>> >>>> The general consensus seems to be "If you can start anew: use >>>> XFS". This leaves one question: as the XFS is not included in the >>>> standard-kernel which option offers the "smoothest sailing" >>>> (especially during kernel-updates): >>> It seems XFS might be added as a default to RHEL 5.4.. >>> >> Probably not a default, but an option. > > Is this a reasonable choice on a 32 bit machine? I thought 4k stacks > were a problem. > I'm sure that RedHat can easily build 32 bit kernels with 8k stacks if they so choose. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 258 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090514/64b959b3/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem
- Next message: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list