On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Tru Huynh <tru at centos.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:16:42AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Here is the updated version: >> >> http://centos.toracat.org/kmods/CentOS-4/xfs/SRPMS/ >> >> Please discard the obsoleted ones (I did not bump the version/release >> number). Let me know when your binaries are ready for testing. >> > rebuilds and uploaded. * Downloaded from http://people.centos.org/tru/kABI/4/RPMS/ and did some test installs. First, installed the kernel version specific kmod-xfs-0.4-1.el4.2.6.9_78.0.22 to the test box and then installed the current kABI-tracking kmod-xfs-0.4-2.el4. It successfully replaced the xfs.ko installed by the former and created symlinks to other installed kernels correctly. Second, installed the current kmod-xfs to an older kernel and then updated the kernel. Upon reboot, a new symlink was created for the newly installed kernel successfully. Third, confirmed that the kABI-tracking kmod-xfs recognized centosplus kernels as expected (even -vm kernels). One example of such symlinks: $ uname -mr 2.6.9-78.0.22.plus.c4 i686 $ ls -l `find /lib/modules -name xfs.ko` lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 May 26 18:20 /lib/modules/2.6.9-67.0.1.EL.plus.c4/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.EL/extra/xfs/xfs.ko lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 May 26 18:20 /lib/modules/2.6.9-67.0.22.ELvm/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.EL/extra/xfs/xfs.ko lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 May 26 18:20 /lib/modules/2.6.9-67.0.4.plus.c4/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.EL/extra/xfs/xfs.ko lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 May 26 18:20 /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.1.ELvm/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.EL/extra/xfs/xfs.ko lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 May 26 18:20 /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.1.plus.c4/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.EL/extra/xfs/xfs.ko -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 598576 May 26 13:07 /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.EL/extra/xfs/xfs.ko lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 May 26 18:34 /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.plus.c4/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.EL/extra/xfs/xfs.ko lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 May 26 18:20 /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.5.EL/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.EL/extra/xfs/xfs.ko lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 May 26 18:20 /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.5.plus.c4/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.EL/extra/xfs/xfs.ko lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 May 26 18:20 /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.8.plus.c4/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.EL/extra/xfs/xfs.ko lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 May 26 18:20 /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.plus.c4/weak-updates/xfs/xfs.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.9-78.0.22.EL/extra/xfs/xfs.ko * I can only test installs/uninstalls. If someone can test it by actually *using* it, that will be great. I did not touch the code, so it should work. Nevertheless... * Some side note In the current kmod-xfs, modules are partially strip'ed. This has a dramatic effect on the size of the modules (hence the packages themselves). For example, the obsoleted rpm's were this big: 3413556 May 25 16:50 kmod-xfs-0.4-2.el4.i686.rpm 3500186 May 25 16:50 kmod-xfs-0.4-2.el4.x86_64.rpm The current packages are: 299042 May 26 13:23 kmod-xfs-0.4-2.el4.i686.rpm 308712 May 26 13:23 kmod-xfs-0.4-2.el4.x86_64.rpm All in-kernel modules are strip'ed during compilation. While it is not required, I think it's better to process the kmods the same way. Akemi