On Mon, 25 May 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:05:44PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: >> At Mon, 25 May 2009 14:25:18 -0700 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: >>> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: >>> >>>> What are the kernel versions? >>> >>> CentOS kernel: >>> >>> 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.centos.plus >>> >>> Fedora 10 kernel: >>> >>> 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 >> >> It could just be a kernel bug that RedHat didn't back port (or one that >> can't be backported easily). Or just a driver update (eg adding a few >> lines to a driver scan structure) that has not been backported yet. >> >> You could get the kernel sources for both kernels and compare the >> relevant .c and .h files and possibly patch the centos.plus kernel and >> rebuild it. Probably not for the faint hearted... >> >> It might also be possible to install the FC10 kernel itself... > > Actually, looks like I got it working. And I was way off on a wild > goose chase. Turns out that after performing this[1] procedure, the > drive is recognized correctly by CentOS. > > Well I learned a little bit more about how udev works at least. :-) > > Now my lsusb looks like the following: > > Bus 001 Device 024: ID 059f:0527 LaCie, Ltd > Bus 001 Device 016: ID 0451:6250 Texas Instruments, Inc. > > (One drive I still need to "reset"). > > Sorry for the noise all. And what was that Texas Instruments device that does not show up on Fedora ? I am intrigued ;-) -- -- dag wieers, dag at centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]