Victor Padro wrote: > > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:23 PM, carlopmart <carlopmart at gmail.com > <mailto:carlopmart at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Victor Padro wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:05 PM, carlopmart <carlopmart at gmail.com > <mailto:carlopmart at gmail.com> > > <mailto:carlopmart at gmail.com <mailto:carlopmart at gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > > RobertH wrote: > > > ive read most of the thread, yet not all. forgive me as i > might > > have missed > > > some of this below in helping... > > > > > > carlopmart, > > > > > > what is in your /etc/resolv.conf > > > > search hpulabs.org <http://hpulabs.org> <http://hpulabs.org> > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 > > > > > > > > is it configured correctly? > > > > > > are you using ipv6? > > > > no. > > > > > > > > if not, is it fully disabled / turned off? > > > > > > in modprobe.conf put > > > > > > alias net-pf-10 off > > > alias ipv6 off > > > > I have configured this previously .. > > > > > > > > > > reboot... > > > > > > also, are you loading those other opsys on the same > machine and > > getting good > > > results or different machines? > > > > I have good results using different operating systems but > using same > > hardware .. > > > > > > > > > > testing other opsys on different hardware could be > problematic. > > > > > > did you bother to check the physical ports to see if any > problems > > in the > > > switch or with ethtool on the server interface ? > > > > No, I didn't do it because i have good results using other > opsys ... > > > > > > thoughtfully consinder following advise of others re: tcp > and dns > > > > > > cables... > > > > > > - rh > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > CentOS mailing list > > > CentOS at centos.org <mailto:CentOS at centos.org> > <mailto:CentOS at centos.org <mailto:CentOS at centos.org>> > > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > > > > > -- > > CL Martinez > > carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at centos.org <mailto:CentOS at centos.org> > <mailto:CentOS at centos.org <mailto:CentOS at centos.org>> > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > > Have you double checked your SELinux config? > > SeLinux is disabled on both CentOS servers ... > > > > > You said you tested different OS'es on the same hardware? or tested > > different OS'es on the same hardware but different servers? > > Same hardware and same server, because all opsys are installed on a > ESXi 3.5u4 > server with vmware tools ... > > > > > Maybe remotely could be a faulty NIC. > > Maybe, but why only centos have problems?? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > "It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion." > > > > "Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o > > mediocremente servidas" > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at centos.org <mailto:CentOS at centos.org> > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > -- > CL Martinez > carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org <mailto:CentOS at centos.org> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > So, the problem resides on an ESXi CentOS VM? > > I thought you were using a dedicated server though. > > If so, what are you using as a NIC? > > Sometimes the driver for e1000 gets faulty on RHEL/CentOS VMs, happened > to me a couple times, just add a new NIC to solve that. > > > -- > "It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion." > > "Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o > mediocremente servidas" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos You are right, Victor. Very very strange, but using vmxnet driver problems disappears on these centos vms ... I don't understand why, because windows vms and ubuntu vms uses e1000 driver without problems .... Many thanks to all for your help. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com