[CentOS] mock, extras vs epel
hrbac.conf at seznam.cz
Tue Nov 3 18:46:02 UTC 2009
Todd Denniston napsal(a):
> I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so I was about to
> install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and another in epel.
> epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that would suggest sticking
> with the extras version instead? Or even reasons other than the shiny version number on the epel one
> to go with it?
> Is the extras version the version used by the upstream provider and thus the CentOS team keeps it
> around to do the matching builds?
> Thanks for the clarifications.
I use mock from our repo:
More information about the CentOS