[CentOS] mock, extras vs epel

David Hrbáč hrbac.conf at seznam.cz
Tue Nov 3 18:46:02 UTC 2009

Todd Denniston napsal(a):
> I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so I was about to 
> install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and another in epel.
> epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that would suggest sticking 
> with the extras version instead? Or even reasons other than the shiny version number on the epel one 
> to go with it?
> Is the extras version the version used by the upstream provider and thus the CentOS team keeps it 
> around to do the matching builds?
> Thanks for the clarifications.

Hi Todd,
I use mock from our repo:
David Hrbáč

More information about the CentOS mailing list