[CentOS] errors on multimedia guidance for x86_64
Steve Huff
shuff at vecna.org
Mon Nov 9 12:09:41 UTC 2009
On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:43 PM, David McGuffey wrote:
>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.8-3.el5.rf.x86_64 from rpmforge has
>> depsolving problems
>> --> Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.8-3.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
>> libquicktime-1.1.3-1.el5.rf.x86_64 from rpmforge has depsolving
>> problems
>> --> Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
>> libquicktime-1.1.3-1.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
>> Error: Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
>> libquicktime-1.1.3-1.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
>> Error: Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.8-3.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
>> You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
>> You could try running: package-cleanup --problems
>> package-cleanup --dupes
>> rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
>> The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils package.
>> [root at desk Desktop]#
>>
>> First question: Is the guidance for multimedia accurate for an 5.4
>> x86_64 load?
>>
>> Second question: is rpmforge fully ready for 5.4?
this is a known issue; Dag has been working on fixing it over the
weekend:
http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2009-November/002797.html
> So...are the gstreamer-plugins in rpmforge ready for 5.4?
i was just able to install gstreamer-plugins-bad on a 5.4 i386 host.
-steve
--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an
improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
http://five.sentenc.es/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091109/9672ed75/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list