[CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines

Tue Nov 17 21:28:08 UTC 2009
KFisler at lakelandcc.edu <KFisler at lakelandcc.edu>

I remember kernel v.0.99pl13...  Back then it seemed that everything Linux 
was version < 1.0.  Stuff was solid then too.  I had one crash in four 
years.  Comparing with Windows 3.1, 3.2, etc., I was almost thinking that 
any software version higher than 1.0 couldn't be any good.  (And so we all 
learn and learn.)




From:
Curt Mills <hacker at fluke.com>
To:
CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Date:
11/02/2009 01:11 PM
Subject:
Re: [CentOS] Keeping iptables in sync across multiple machines
Sent by:
centos-bounces at centos.org



On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Bowie Bailey wrote:

> mark wrote:
>> *I* would *never* put something that was under 1.0 (actually, 1.0.1) 
into
>> production.
>
> Keep in mind that version numbers are often fairly arbitrary (esp. on
> open source projects).

True.  Anyone remember this one?  0.99pl92

That's a linux kernel from the time when Linus just would _not_ bump
it up to v1.0 and move on.  He stayed with 0.99 versions for a
lonnnnnnng time.

-- 
Curt Mills, WE7U                             hacker at fluke dot com
Senior Methods Engineer/SysAdmin
   "Lotto:  A tax on people who are bad at math."     -- unknown
"Windows:  Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
"The world DOES revolve around me:  I picked the coordinate system!"

Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information.
 If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or
re-transmit this email.  If you have received this email in error,
please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone
(call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any
attachments.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance.

In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of
this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, 
any
contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the
foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any
digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is
included in any attachment to this email.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091117/cdf6cbb3/attachment-0003.html>