On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:14:56AM -0700, Craig White wrote: > > NFS mounts for Linux users > Samba for Windows users > Netatalk for Macintosh clients Wow, I didn't even know netatalk was still around! How does it compare to SMB on OS X clients? I'm thinking that, unless you have a pressing need for some particular netatalk option, that using Samba for those clients as well simplifies admin on the backend. IOW, what are the scenarios where netatalk is either strongly preferred or required over Samba? --keith -- kkeller at speakeasy.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091126/0a2818bd/attachment-0003.sig>