Robert wrote: > Rod Rook wrote: > > >> Robert, I responded to Lee's statement which referred to >> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083346.html >> It is all there if you follow the thread. >> Anyway, you agree with me that there is a bug or bugs in CentOS 5.4. >> As I said earlier, it is not a critical matter, but it does not >> instill confidence in me about CentOS distro. What other bugs are >> there? The interesting thing, at least to me, is that there seems to >> be conspiratorial silence about such bugs. Nobody wants to speak ill >> of their beloved distro? >> > I'm sure there are other bugs. I'm equally sure there's no "conspiracy > of silence" here, though. I guess the bug tracker would no longer exist > if that was the case... > Going a bit further, the empty boot.log is listed in RedHat's bugzilla (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=boot.log) as bug # 529221 and 489838 The only reason I'm interested in it is that the nuances in syslog.conf still haven't penetrated my thick skull.