Todd Denniston napsal(a): > I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so I was about to > install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and another in epel. > > epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that would suggest sticking > with the extras version instead? Or even reasons other than the shiny version number on the epel one > to go with it? > > Is the extras version the version used by the upstream provider and thus the CentOS team keeps it > around to do the matching builds? > > Thanks for the clarifications. Hi Todd, I use mock from our repo: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mock.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/mock.html David Hrbáč