Les Mikesell wrote: > Don't count on exceptions to last - or that linux is inherently better. > Windows 2003 server and later can be reliable enough to use, so the > only real driving force to convert is the license cost and > administration differences. Yeah for me it doesn't really matter, if some company comes in and buys us and says we're going to windows I'll say I'm going to another company, lots of places interested in hiring people in my position so nice to have the flexibility. In fact now that I think about it, about 9 years ago I was at a company and another IT guy who was more MS-based wanted to migrate from NT4 to Win2k(the bulk of the stuff I was responsible for was Linux/Solaris/HPUX/Tru64/AIX, though there was a touch of NT4 too). I told him(and my boss) if you do I'm leaving(back in my LDAP days wanting to use Samba as PDC). And they never did, well not till after I left anyways. We still joke about it to this day. I don't have anything too much against windows myself I just have no interest in using it. Not worth my time. Stopped using it for the most part about 11 years ago, haven't had a need to look back. nate