On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:43 PM, David McGuffey wrote: >> --> Finished Dependency Resolution >> gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.8-3.el5.rf.x86_64 from rpmforge has >> depsolving problems >> --> Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package >> gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.8-3.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) >> libquicktime-1.1.3-1.el5.rf.x86_64 from rpmforge has depsolving >> problems >> --> Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package >> libquicktime-1.1.3-1.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) >> Error: Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package >> libquicktime-1.1.3-1.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) >> Error: Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package >> gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.8-3.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) >> You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem >> You could try running: package-cleanup --problems >> package-cleanup --dupes >> rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest >> The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils package. >> [root at desk Desktop]# >> >> First question: Is the guidance for multimedia accurate for an 5.4 >> x86_64 load? >> >> Second question: is rpmforge fully ready for 5.4? this is a known issue; Dag has been working on fixing it over the weekend: http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2009-November/002797.html > So...are the gstreamer-plugins in rpmforge ready for 5.4? i was just able to install gstreamer-plugins-bad on a 5.4 i386 host. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091109/9672ed75/attachment-0005.sig>