-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 11/09/2009 12:58 AM, Markus Falb wrote: >> Dont misunderstand me, please. I was about to take care of your (CentOS) >> bandwidth. And, my feeling is that my setups are my cup of tea. > > I dont think you understand what 5.3 means in respect to CentOS-5. Or > what and how 5.4 superseeds it. I suggest, and strongly, that you > consider the advice and urls you have been pointed at and look into this > a bit. > > You are correct, possibly. I read the advice. I looked at the URLs pointed to. Maybe i am too dumb, but i still consider 5 ! 5.4 My feeling is that your point is: 5.X is bad. 5 is stable, therefore use 5. My experience with 5.4 was two bugs, #3884 and #3923, and both of them triggered disfunctionality at update time, so i can not use 5 for stabilities sake. Thanks anyways, - -- best regards, markus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkr4VMkACgkQYoWFBIJE9eXuiwCgs0Xi/29dd5hIFYJlFyOmaTnq UOcAoLqHS46Cq+DHxYSNX6BhrR6hk65Q =ggnc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----