Keith Keller schrieb: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:14:56AM -0700, Craig White wrote: > >> NFS mounts for Linux users >> Samba for Windows users >> Netatalk for Macintosh clients >> > > Wow, I didn't even know netatalk was still around! How does it compare > to SMB on OS X clients? I'm thinking that, unless you have a pressing > need for some particular netatalk option, that using Samba for those > clients as well simplifies admin on the backend. IOW, what are the > scenarios where netatalk is either strongly preferred or required over > Samba? > > My guess would be: Macs with OS 9 or older ;-)