[CentOS] CentOS for non-tech user

Geoff Galitz geoff at galitz.org
Thu Oct 1 08:22:48 UTC 2009

> On 09/29/2009 09:21 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
> > Ubuntu has the LTS releases, which are long term stable releases. They
> are
> > supported for five years after release.
> you might want to look into exactly what is ubuntu-support and how that
> compares with what you get with CentOS. Its not nearly the same thing.
> To an extent that LTS is mostly considered a nonstarter in most > very
> small business. Specially where the client is in a position to evaluate
> their options and work out the implications of what they are getting. It
> always surprises me how many are not.

Would you mind elaborating on your views on that?  I did some basic research
on the LTS offerings and I don't see any significant differences with the
exception of porting elements from Debian testing.

What constitutes real LTS in your view?


Geoff Galitz
Blankenheim NRW, Germany

More information about the CentOS mailing list