[CentOS] Bare Metal vs virtualization
Scott Ehrlich
srehrlich at gmail.comFri Oct 9 19:18:45 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Simple way to banish IP addresses ?
- Next message: [CentOS] Bare Metal vs virtualization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello to all: I know this list is generally Linux-only, but I figured I'd try to gain wisdom from those with hard-core Windows needs, too. I was recently pricing out a high-end desktop system for a user who will doing a lot of CAD, Matlab, SolidWorks, and other apps that will utilize a lot of number crunching and video. The quote for the desktop (64-bit Vista is likely), which included 12 GB RAM, two 1 TB SATA hard drives, a high-end NVidia 3D video card, and two Intel quad-core 3.3 Ghz processors, was about $15k. An approval manager asked if the money could be better spent towards a cluster for others to use. This user's needs are for Windows-based apps. The open question, then, is can the results the user needs be derived from a high-end Windows cluster or virtual environment that is multi-user capable and runs Windows-based apps, or do they need bare metal for true results and performance? I awaiting an answer on this from the user. In the meantime, for those who may have been faced with this, too, what have you discovered/learned? Thanks. Scott
- Previous message: [CentOS] Simple way to banish IP addresses ?
- Next message: [CentOS] Bare Metal vs virtualization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list