[CentOS] Antwort: Re: du vs df size difference
Jerry Queirolo
jerry at queirolo.comFri Oct 2 18:26:32 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Antwort: Re: du vs df size difference
- Next message: [CentOS] du vs df size difference
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This is quite possible, and having just gone thru this recently a few weeks ago, I thought I post a warning here to hopefully save someone else from the brain-fart I suffered a few weeks ago. I needed to change the mount point permissions w/out umounting the filesystems in a few places, so I remounted / over /tmp/mnt (that was my brain fart, should have used /mnt/tmp). Did my thing, changed what I needed to and then got sidetracked on other things and never got around to umount'ing /tmp/mnt. Next day I started noticing weirdness, and then realized cron.daily fired off it's tmpwatch run and it happily started cleaning older things from /tmp/mnt/... :-( - Jerry Frank.Brodbeck at klingel.de wrote: > This is absolutely untested but it could work: mount / to /mnt and delete > the data from there. Dig into mount(8) and test this somewhere outside > the production area: > > --bind Remount a subtree somewhere else (so that its contents are > available in both places). See above. > > But again, this is untested and nothing more but a wild guess. > > >
- Previous message: [CentOS] Antwort: Re: du vs df size difference
- Next message: [CentOS] du vs df size difference
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list