Still waiting for DVD 5.4 64 bit Regards, David ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ./nobody mark wrote: > Robert wrote: > >> m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >>> Matt wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> I admit I wasn't following the screaming and yelling about 5.4, so >>>>> excuse me if this has been answered.... >>>>> >>>>> My boss tells me he wants me to start rolling out 5.4. I want to d/l & >>>>> burn a DVD... but when I looked at a number of mirrors, the .iso is from >>>>> 1 Oct, while the CD .iso's are from the 14th... yet 5.4 was officially >>>>> announced the other day. >>>>> >>>>> Am I missing something, or do the mirrors have a pre-release DVD .iso, >>>>> with no fixes in the last three weeks, or ...? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created. >>>> Therefore, if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found >>>> >>> with it in >>> >>> >>>> QA, then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct. The ISOs are >>>> based on the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat released >>>> after the initial release of RHEL 5.4. >>>> >>>> >>> But why are the 7-iso set of CD's from two weeks later? Or is it just that >>> folks felt that building those was more important than rebuilding the DVD >>> version? >>> >>> >> Dates aside, the official Release Notes at >> http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4 contains >> checksums for each of the isos. It seems to me that you should >> be able to apply those md5 and sha1 sums to the DVD.iso file, no >> matter the source, and be reasonably comfortable with the result. >> > > Already did all that - I was trying to minimize updates, since we'll be using > the DVD for a while.... > > mark > >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> >> > > >