I wouldn't use Fedora for my servers. It's a great distro for desktop use but I didn't like it's server usage. On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:35 PM, David Suhendrik <david at pnyet.web.id> wrote: > Ron Blizzard wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:31 PM, David Suhendrik<david at pnyet.web.id> <david at pnyet.web.id> wrote: > > > Dear All, > I'm newbie and i want to know Your opinion about CentOS vs Fedora, hopefully > this isn't make a flame, and just to curious.. > Actucally now I'm using CentOS as some servers. ^_^' > > > For me CentOS is just a better choice. I prefer stability to "cutting > edge" -- even for my desktop computers (I don't have any servers). > I've tried several versions of Fedora -- liked the earlier versions, > thought versions 7 through 9 were a bit too "cutting edge," but am > impressed with 10 and 11. Still, due to the nature of Fedora, you've > got a *lot* of upgrades and I think that would beat me down after a > while. If CentOS (or Scientific Linux) didn't exist, I would probably > use Fedora. > > > > I'm using CentOS with reason same as You, I'm isn't beta tester and won't > using tester on productive servers. But sometimes i'm using Fedora repos for > upgrade some packages. > > Cheers... > -- > Regards, > David > ------------------------------ > ./nobody > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- http://www.jewelerslounge.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090910/7ef77aac/attachment-0005.html>