[CentOS] socket: write vs send
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comTue Apr 6 19:37:27 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] socket: write vs send
- Next message: [CentOS] socket: write vs send
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/6/2010 2:16 PM, Michael D. Berger wrote: > On CentOS 5.4, > Linux 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 3 16:18:27 EST 2009 > i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > In man 2 send I find: > > The send() call may be used only when the socket is in a connected > state (so that the intended recipient is known). The only difference > between send() and write() is the presence of flags. With zero flags > parameter, send() is equivalent to write(). > > In some complex server software, if the client disconnects: > send: delivers errno == ECONNRESET > but > write: crashes the server process. > > So it is not really equivalent. Any thoughts on this? Are you sure it isn't the normal signal associated with a write when the other end closes first that is crashing the process? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] socket: write vs send
- Next message: [CentOS] socket: write vs send
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list