[CentOS] 12-15 TB RAID storage recommendations
Seth Bardash
seth at integratedsolutions.orgTue Apr 13 19:50:58 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] 12-15 TB RAID storage recommendations
- Next message: [CentOS] 12-15 TB RAID storage recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/13/2010 1:38 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/13/2010 2:29 PM, Seth Bardash wrote: >> Just finished building a new server for inhouse use. 12.8TB >> >> Needed a nfs and samba server which could store 10TB and be reliable. >> Also wanted to replace out DHCP server and our internal DNS server. >> So needed to run dnsmasq plus ntp for time serving. >> >> This machine replace 3 older units. > > I'm not sure I'd put those on the same box - at least not for most > scenarios. If the machine ever goes down and needs an fsck before > coming up, your DNS and DHCP services are going to be down for a long > time while it completes, killing the rest of your network. too. > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.801 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2808 - Release Date: 04/13/10 00:32:00 > Point Taken and correct!! I always have 2 DNS / DHCP / NTP servers up. One running, one just a service xxx start away. Since we need an inhouse use web server for testing before we go live we use that machine as the standby. Seth Bardash Integrated Solutions and Systems LLC seth at integratedsolutions.org Failure cannot survive knowledge and perseverance!
- Previous message: [CentOS] 12-15 TB RAID storage recommendations
- Next message: [CentOS] 12-15 TB RAID storage recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list