[CentOS] OT: Caching synchronous writes
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comSat Apr 24 16:43:07 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] OT: Caching synchronous writes
- Next message: [CentOS] OT: Caching synchronous writes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ross Walker wrote: > > NFS should always be 'sync' if performance isn't good, then your > storage isn't good. Why demand sync on remote storage when you typically don't have it locally? Programs that need transactional integrity should know when to fsync() and for anything else there's not much difference whether you crash before or after a write() was issued in terms of it not completing. -- Les Mikesesll lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] OT: Caching synchronous writes
- Next message: [CentOS] OT: Caching synchronous writes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list