> Web servers are mostly read-only, so unless your web servers are going > to do a lot of writing to shared storage I would simply use rsync to a > local disk in each server, or use NFS, even NFS and heartbeat for > redundancy will be 100 times simpler to setup and maintain. > > GFS/OCFS2/Gluster/Lustre are really for multi-writers to shared > storage such as a large NFS server cluster (4-8-16 nodes) serving > thousands of clients for general file services, not thousands of > clients accessing shared storage directly. > It's a good point. Thanks for making it. OCFS2 seems like a pain to maintain with new rpm's for each new kernel update, and GFS a pain to setup at the least. We just want scalability for future hosting options; it seems like GFS is the most powerful option. But you're right that there is not a lot of writing going on and NFS is probably the best option. > -Ross > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >