On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Bart Schaefer <barton.schaefer at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Rudi Ahlers <rudiahlers at gmail.com> wrote: >> Mark, >> >> We, in South Africa sit with a huge problem in that our clients can't >> connect to the rest of the world cause SEACOM is down. i.e. our client >> can, for the past 3 days, only surf local (i.e. local in South Africa) >> websites, email, etc. >> >> So, I want to reroute all their traffic via one of our other servers >> >> <ADSL client> - <Limited internet> - <server> - <full internet> > > I'm rather rusty on the details of this, but isn't the correct way to > handle this to have <server> publish an ARP route indicating that it > provides routing to (the IP space containing) <ADSL client>? > > Any mere proxy or VPN hosted at <server> will allow <ADSL client> to > transparently establish connections, but won't allow <full internet> > to reach the IP address of <ADSL client> (nor anything else in > <Limited internet>). Maybe that's not needed here. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > I don't know either....... And I haven't been able to install openvpn on the ADSL hosted server either, so I want to try a gateway type setup -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532