[CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?
Rudi Ahlers
Rudi at SoftDux.comTue Aug 3 20:04:58 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?
- Next message: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin <centos.admin at gmail.com> wrote: > > One of the problem with Lustre's style of distributed storage which > Gluster points out is that the bottleneck is the meta server which > tells clients where to find the actual data. Gluster supposedly scales > with every client machine added because it doesn't use a meta server, > file locations are determined using some kind of computed hash. > But who uses gluster in a production environment then? I have seen less posts (both on forums and mailing lists) about Glusteter, than lustre. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532
- Previous message: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?
- Next message: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list