[CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comWed Aug 4 12:48:06 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?
- Next message: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John R Pierce wrote: > On 08/03/10 11:31 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: >> But then is ZFS a Cluster filesystem at all like GFS2/OCFS? Haven't >> studied that angle as yet. > > its not. and, afaik, the linux implementation of ZFS is not very well > supported, I certainly wouldn't commit to a project relying on it > without a LOT of testing. ZFS is very stable on Solaris, and I > understand its working quite well with FreeBSD > > Supposedly the new btfs for linux will be the choice. i'll remain > skeptical of that until its proven itself in varied production > environments by others. I thought there was a small limit on the number of hard links in btfs - that might make it unsuitable for general purpose use. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?
- Next message: [CentOS] who uses Lustre in production with virtual machines?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list