[CentOS] xen vs kvm for virtualization on centos/rhel?
Whit Blauvelt
whit at transpect.comMon Aug 9 19:50:02 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] xen vs kvm for virtualization on centos/rhel?
- Next message: [CentOS] xen vs kvm for virtualization on centos/rhel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 03:17:10PM -0400, Bobby wrote: > I recommend using VirtualBOX from Sun. Close to wire speed, no need to alter > the kernel. Simple and flexible to use. No need to alter the kernel for KVM either. VirtualBox formerly from Sun has been gathering bugs since Oracle took over. Personally I wouldn't recommend it for serious use. It's a nice shiney toy though. But if you use, for instance, its snapshotting feature, and then something goes wrong, veteran users in the support forums will tell you you were a fool to ever trust the feature. Guess you're supposed to have an instinct about it. Simple is no good when major simple features aren't dependable. Whit
- Previous message: [CentOS] xen vs kvm for virtualization on centos/rhel?
- Next message: [CentOS] xen vs kvm for virtualization on centos/rhel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list