[CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?
John Doe
jdmls at yahoo.comThu Aug 12 09:45:32 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?
- Next message: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: Fajar Priyanto <fajarpri at arinet.org> > Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due > no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off > when the office closed, and auto power on again in the morning. That > thing happened for years and it was fine ^^ > Recently, I setup a Centos 5.5 file server with ext3 and got power > blackout twice and I notice the filesystem got corrupted and also bad > sectors. > Is it just pure random luck, software or hardware issue? > What's your experience? I am pretty sure bad sectors = corruption. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_sector JD
- Previous message: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?
- Next message: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list