[CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet
James Hogarth
james.hogarth at gmail.comFri Aug 27 18:18:46 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet
- Next message: [CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > > Thanks to everyone for the replies, and the links to articles for > further research. I will definitely continue reading those. > > At this time, we are not interested in Spacewalk because of the Oracle > db requirement, but I will investigate the other options as well. > -- > Doug Given your numbers given (20 web servers) you can use oracle-xe for the instance on the local box without much issue. My 80 odd systems with CentOS Base, Updates, EPEL, Spacewalk and my own custom repos all in place with full mirrors of upstream take about 2GB of the 4GB allowance of Oracle-XE. Work is ongoing to switch to postgres... but that probably won't be complete for at least 4-6 months if not longer. At the end of the day it depends on your requirements - if you want to manage package updates and kickstarts as well or just configuration files. Spacewalk is better for the former but if just files I'd favor puppet, James James
- Previous message: [CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet
- Next message: [CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list