[CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comFri Aug 27 19:41:59 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet
- Next message: [CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 8/27/2010 1:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > At any rate I stand by my position that in tech if you are going to > put an opinion piece out on a mailing list, a blog or another medium > it should be relevant to the current situation and not something you > tried a year ago and didn't work out great so you advise others to > steer clear a year later without checking to see what progress, if > any, has been made in that area. Agreed, but a large part of that opinion and one of the most helpful pieces of information for others relates to how stable a project is over a long period of time. Of course it is hard to predict the future, but the past is often a good indicator. If we weren't all interested in stability, we probably wouldn't be subscribed to this particular mail list. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet
- Next message: [CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list