On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:20:38AM -0700, R-Elists wrote: > > the point is enforcement somehow... Enforcement = suppression and suppression -> consequences not elimination of the issue. > > why not require a small yearly donation for access to the list ??? > > 12 bucks a year? or more ? Not likely to make a difference and just likely to reduce the worth of the list as those who know quit bothering to subscribe. ////jerry > > donations cannot be taken back yet lusers can be moderated or terminated > > and to come back, they donate again > > - rh > > > But what's the point? When you give away good, free stuff, > > people are naturally going to ask for more. The part I have > > trouble understanding is that while it seems perfectly > > acceptable to be dumb about most coding languages and ask for > > a canned routine to do something you are too lazy to write > > for yourself, the same does not apply to shell commands even > > though there is not much inherent difference in complexity. > > Is it just that coders are more willing to share their work > > than administrators even in cases where it is equally reusable? > > > > -- > > Les Mikesell > > lesmikesell at gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos