On 08/29/2010 11:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/28/10 11:04 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
>> On 08/28/2010 12:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 8/28/10 10:29 AM, ganu MailList wrote:
>>>> I had set the initdefault as 5
>>>>
>>>
>>> 5 comes after 1,2,3, etc.
>>
>> I do hope you were making a joke and not really claiming that
>> the system progresses through runlevels 2, 3, and 4 on its
>> way to runlevel 5.
>
> Progressing through the run levels is the way it is supposed to work to ensure
> that the complex and necessary sequence of processes started by init are done in
> the right order when you change levels either direction. At least that's the
> way it was designed in unix. Linux sometimes cheats - and using runlevel 5 to
> start X was sort of an afterthought. I guess you could wade through the /etc/rc
> script to see what it does these days.
The script goes directly to the specified runlevel. Nothing from the other
/etc/rc.d/rc[0-6].d directories is examined at all. That's the way it has
been for a long, long time.
--
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
Do NOT delete it.