On 12/17/10 8:18 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
>
> Longevity (things continue to work without breakage for a long time):
> This kind of implies "don't keep stuff continously updated to recent
> versions" don't you think?
It could work that way if the upstream developers of the thousands of included
projects understood the need for backwards compatibility to keep things working.
They don't.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com