John Lundin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 02:35:13PM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> John Lundin wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:30:43PM +0200, Roland RoLaNd wrote: > [...] >> Well, yes, but he also wanted a count.... > > Oh, lord, it's worse than that. I was solving the wrong problem. (And > still am if he really wanted a count of after-nine entries.) > > Once again with awk one-liners: Why? What do you have against more-than-one-line awk scripts? asks the guy who's written 100 and 200 line awk scripts....