On Tuesday, December 21, 2010 09:57:52 pm Kevin C wrote: > Yes, Well "works for you" may be more correct then. Hard to call it "stable" especially in the context of an enterprise dist when it's officially a "technology preview". /Peter > We use it for 4 months on our backup server, we no issue at the > moment. We have a lot of files, ext4 increase the backup speed. The > backup time is now 3hours, and was 5 hours with ext3. > > Le 21/12/2010 21:22, Matt a écrit : > > Is ext4 stable on CentOS 5.5 64bit? I have an email server with a > > great deal of disk i/o and was wandering if ext4 would be better then > > ext3 for it? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20101222/3d4d1ab4/attachment-0005.sig>