[CentOS] two cents or not two cents
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comFri Dec 17 17:33:59 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] two cents or not two cents
- Next message: [CentOS] two cents or not two cents
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/17/10 11:11 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote: > >> It could work that way if the upstream developers of the thousands of >> included projects understood the need for backwards compatibility to keep >> things working. They don't. > > While fine in theory this wouldn't work in real life since they would have to > be backwards compatible not only for their official features but also for > bugs/quirks/unintended features. > > So even if those thousands of upstream projects managed to remain (from their > perspective) perfectly backwards compatible things would still break. > > Not to mention the need to break backwards compatibility once in a while to > move projects along (read: major versions). That 'need' kind of depends on how bad your original interface designs were. How much has the kernel needed to break from either Posix or the SysVr4 spec? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] two cents or not two cents
- Next message: [CentOS] two cents or not two cents
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list