Am 03.12.2010 13:55, schrieb Keith Roberts: > There was a similar thread about which is the best FS for > Centos. > > I'm using ext3, and wondered if XFS would be more 'data > safe' than ext3. > > I had a 100GiB ext3 partition, and it took up 1.75GiB for FS > administration purposes. I reformatted it to XFS, and it > only used 50.8MB! Just yesterday we had the case of hitting ext3 limits - a folder can only contain 32k subfolders. So I had to create a XFS container, to hold the amount of data. Rainer