On 12/09/2010 10:30 AM, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 25/11/10 14:12, J.Witvliet at mindef.nl wrote: > [...snip...] > >> Will you be confronted with IPv6 in the (not so) near future? Forget >> OpenVPN, it is still beta there, while it has been implemented in >> strongswan for ages, and part of there standard test plan. >> > Okay, I'll admit up-front I'm biased, as I am involved in the OpenVPN > project. But I can provide some info here. > > IPv6 is currently in the development tree. I'm using it on my personal > equipment now, using IPv6 over TUN interface between a OpenWRT router > and a Linux "road warrior" client. I'm also looking for how to get this > code base compiled for maemo5 as well. Early next year, I'm going to > run this development code on a couple of production boxes as well. > > Another developer (the guy who implemented the IPv6 support) is also > using this IPv6 implementation in a bigger environment too. > > We're currently in the end of the beta round for OpenVPN-2.2 and will > release a RC version around Christmas. The full release will come > sometime around January. That code base is without IPv6. (2.2 is > basically a bigger bugfix release with a couple of new features) > > The 2.3-beta round is scheduled sometime around February/March, with a > release slated for late summer 2011. This release will include IPv6 > support, both for transport (connect/listen/bind to IPv6 addresses) and > payload (IPv6 over tun and tap via tunnel with IPv6 client configuration > support). > > <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/4221> > > But for early adopters ... the current development code is stable enough > for daily usage without too much troubles. And we would like to see > more people testing out this code. > > <https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/TesterDocumentation> > > >> Furthermore, openvpn is only compatible with openvpn, while using ipsec you might be able to connect to other boxes. >> > That is mostly true, except for those vendors adding their own > proprietary extensions to their ipsec implementations ... thus making it > a vendor lock-in again. > > Hmm... We run ipsec, (using ipsec-tools on both Linux and FreeBSD), to Cisco, Juniper, NetScreen and many others without problem. What vendors are you talking about? > "That's the wonderful thing about standards, > everyone can have their own" > - unknown > > > kind regards, > > David Sommerseth > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20101209/92868e2c/attachment-0005.html>