2010/12/13 Gé Weijers <ge at weijers.org>: > > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> RHEL is much better about that, although by now the "production" RHEL >> 5 is 4 years out of date, the "leading edge" RHEL 6 is now one year >> out of date after the lengthy release testing, and CentOS will always >> lag that. > > I believe "out of date" is the wrong wording. RHEL/CentOS 5 is maintained, > i.e. security issues and bugs are fixed. There's nothing "out of date" > about a tool that works and is cost-effective. RHEL 6 still has to prove > itself. RHEL provides 10 year support cycle, I hope Centos can do same :) -- Eero