[CentOS] dm-crypt/LUKS the state of the art for block device encryption?
Peter Kjellstrom
cap at nsc.liu.seTue Feb 2 17:25:19 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] dm-crypt/LUKS the state of the art for block device encryption?
- Next message: [CentOS] dm-crypt/LUKS the state of the art for block device encryption?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday 02 February 2010, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > it's been a while since i've played with filesystem encryption so, > on centos 5.4 (and other linux distros), is dm-crypt/LUKS considered > to be the state of the art WRT encryption? i remember other solutions > like loop-aes and others, but what's considered the gold standard > these days? Yes, dm-crypt/LUKS/ configured in /etc/crypttab is the "blessed" way afaik. /Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100202/669ef074/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] dm-crypt/LUKS the state of the art for block device encryption?
- Next message: [CentOS] dm-crypt/LUKS the state of the art for block device encryption?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list