>-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf >Of Kai Schaetzl >Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:32 PM >To: centos at centos.org >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS > >Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:44:40 +0100: > >> Doing the same search for RHEL5 gave me two packages (one for i386 and one >for >> x86_64); v3.1.0-5. > >Not from Red Hat. No, from epel. >> I thought all packages available from the prominent American upstream provider >> got a treatment from the CentOS crew? > >Red Hat doesn't provide BackupPC packages. So anything (more or less) that RH provides, we also get for CentOS while any extra fluff like BackupPC for CentOS, is 3rd party. Did I get that correct? -- /Sorin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5110 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100225/ee9d7f72/attachment-0004.bin>