2010/2/17 <m.roth at 5-cent.us>: >> 2010/2/17 <m.roth at 5-cent.us>: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:51 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Could be $%^&* flash. That was happening about 4 mos. ago. >>>>> >>>> Mark, can you be a bit more specific, please? >>>> >>>> What / which flash are you referring to exactly? >>> >>> Flashplayer. nsplugin<whatsit> There was even (finally) a bug reported >>> for >>> it, a few months back, and it took them a week to find an unnoted >>> dependency, and not only would firefox crash, but their crashreporter >>> would crash, because *it* was dependent upon the missing package. >> >> nspluginwrapper? 32bit flash on 64bit env? why you just don't run the >> 64bit flash? > > You mean the version that didn't exist, and is just now mentioned on > slashdot as ->ALPHA<- software? yes, it still works better than 32bit pluginwrapped version. Try it at: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/64bit.html -- Eero